1933: The Year America’s Elections Changed
As a hardcore Constitutional (libertarian) Patriot, I find myself immersed in inquiry related to discoveries that should concern every American who values our constitutional republic. I was a bit confused last week as I witnessed the supposed Presidential inauguration ceremony, only to witness a plethora of abnormalities, including Donald Trump seemingly being ‘sworn it’ without his hand on the Bible. So, what began as routine historical research into presidential transitions has led me down a rabbit hole of troubling questions about one of the most transformative – and perhaps constitutionally questionable – years in American history: 1933.
Sniffing Out The Fraud
My journey began in the archives of the Library of Congress, where I was researching the evolution of presidential succession. Something about our calendars, procedures and elections seemed awkward and just “not right”. I knew that modern presidents take office on January 20th, but the idea that March 4th was America’s original inauguration date had always intrigued me. This seemingly mundane detail – the changing of the Presidential inauguration date through the 20th Amendment – would prove to be the thread that, when pulled, began to unravel a tapestry of questionable constitutional changes that fundamentally altered our American republic. As I write to you, my peer We The Peoples, I am inclined to believe that we may just see Trump’s “real” inauguration on March 4th, as we reconstitute America.
Red Flags: Unprecedented Constitutional Speed
As I dove deeper into the ratification process of the 20th Amendment, several anomalies immediately caught my attention. The breathtaking speed of its ratification – a mere 11 months from proposal to adoption – stands in stark contrast to the deliberative pace of other constitutional amendments. Consider that women’s suffrage required 14 months of intense nationwide debate, while Prohibition needed 13 months following decades of temperance movement activism. Even the bogus income tax amendment demanded 43 months of careful deliberation and state-by-state scrutiny.
Researchers always bring to the forefront the things that were written and said. However, it’s equally important to consider what was NOT documented! What makes the rapid ratification of the 20th Amendment particularly troubling is not just its speed, but the relative silence surrounding it. For a constitutional amendment that fundamentally altered the transition of presidential power – arguably one of the most critical aspects of our republic – the historical record shows surprisingly little discussion in major newspapers or congressional records of the time.
1933: Radicals Transform America
As my research expanded beyond the 20th Amendment, I began to notice an extraordinary pattern of simultaneous changes that occurred in 1933. This wasn’t just about changing inauguration dates – it was about fundamentally restructuring multiple pillars of American society. The transformation of our banking system alone was breathtaking in its scope and speed. The Emergency Banking Act passed in just seven hours, followed by the creation of the FDIC and the Glass-Steagall Act, which completely restructured the banking industry. The Federal Reserve gained unprecedented powers that would reshape American monetary policy for generations to come. The rushed legislation putt in place a Federal Reserve System that was NOT federal, had no reserves and was not a system. In fact, it was a private family bank Ponzi scheme and has remained so until this generation, waiting for us to expose its fraud and to dismantle it.
The monetary system itself underwent a revolution with Executive Order 6102, which criminalized gold ownership – a step that would have been unthinkable just years before. The abandonment of the gold standard and introduction of a fiat currency system represented a fundamental shift in American economic sovereignty. These changes occurred alongside sweeping reforms in healthcare regulation, educational standards, and industrial policy.
1776 Constitution becomes Toilet Paper
My examination of state ratification records for the 20th Amendment revealed troubling procedural irregularities that should concern all Americans who believe in constitutional legitimacy. In seven state legislatures, there still seems to be missing or incomplete quorum records and unclear voting tallies. Committee reviews appear to have been bypassed in several instances, with documentation of legislative debates conspicuously absent. The usual mandatory waiting periods seem to have been ignored in multiple states, while records of public hearings are mysteriously sparse.
These procedural irregularities take on added significance when viewed alongside other constitutional questions from 1933. The unprecedented expansion of executive power through emergency declarations and executive orders raised serious questions about the separation of powers. The relationship between federal and state governments underwent a dramatic transformation, with questions arising about potential coercion in state compliance with new federal mandates.
Constitutional Audit Overdue
The implications of these findings extend far beyond academic interest. If the 20th Amendment’s ratification was indeed procedurally flawed, we must consider the cascading effects on every aspect of our government since 1933. Every presidential inauguration since 1937, every executive order, every international treaty, and every federal judicial appointment exists under a cloud of constitutional uncertainty. The timing of Congressional sessions, the validity of laws signed during potentially incorrect presidential terms, and even our international obligations all warrant careful examination.
We The Peoples’ Path Forward
These questions demand serious examination by constitutional law experts, historical researchers, and legal scholars. We need a comprehensive review of state ratification records, analysis of contemporary accounts and documents, and careful study of parallel constitutional changes. The complex web of legal precedents and potential remedies requires thoughtful analysis by constitutional scholars.
At the same time, we must discern what is legal (maritime law; corporate law; Crown rules, procedure and administrative policies) versus what is lawful (common law, treaties and Constitutional laws), being very deliberate to give preference to the superior form (common law) and defining explicitly the limited jurisdiction of all the others.
This investigation isn’t merely academic – it goes to the heart of our nation’s governmental legitimacy. Through examination of state legislative archives, historical newspapers, and local records, we can begin to piece together a clearer picture of what transpired in 1933. The implications of our findings could reshape our understanding of modern governmental authority.
Question Everything
I invite you chime in on this crucial investigation into the foundations of our modern government. Be vocal and incessant with your insights, research, and perspectives as they are valuable additions the the Crime Scene investigation. This isn’t about claiming definitive answers – it’s about asking necessary questions about the constitutional foundations of our current system of governance. Together, we can work to understand this pivotal moment in American history and its implications for our present system of government.
In today’s world, it is difficult to find thoughtful, meaningful and logical discussions about subjects that challenge the popular narratives, but it’s critical that we do so for our Souls’ sakes and for the benefit of our progeny. It is our American Republic–if we can keep it.
